The cornerstone of our First Amendment speech protections were intended to protect the minority viewpoint from the tyranny of majority. Our founders’ understanding of the truth of these principles came from lessons learned from years of personal experience with the tyrannical government of Great Britain. They understood that the most detestable or controversial speech needed protection in order to maintain freedom for all. They also keenly understood that religious and political speakers needed protection from those who would silence or imprison dissenters from the party in power.
Whereas, my last article focused on the government actors who run afoul of the Constitution by attempting to limit a person’s freedom of speech, freedom of religion or right to assemble and to protest, there are no such constitutional ...