Complimentary Story
Recently, my wife and I were discussing the farcical nature of the societal hysteria for COVID-19. Without denying the reality of the virus, it is reasonable to suggest that the governmental response has been draconian in its overreaction, provoking significant questions about infringements on constitutional liberties and the development of an alarming executive precedent for future incidents of a similar nature. Our discussion grudgingly turned to the recent reports conveying the implication of a mandatory or compulsory vaccine and she became quite emotional to the point of tears. As of the beginning of April, Australia’s New South Wales Prime Minister, Gladys Berejiklian, established her firm position that social distancing laws will remain in effect “until a vaccine is found.” Currently, “social distancing” is considered the new “way of life” for this territory which has authorized “on-the-spot” $1,000 fines for citizens violating the policy. Researchers at the Harvard School of Public Health announced in April that unless a vaccine is found quickly, not only will social distancing rules have to be followed until 2022, but that “surveillance” of “SARS-COV-2” should continue for prevention of a possible resurgence through 2024. The governments of the United Kingdom, Germany, Italy, and the U.S. are evaluating the possibility of instituting “immunity passports” that will publicly identify whether someone has either developed appropriate antibodies against the Coronavirus or received the vaccine. This will legally authorize a return to “normal life” and allow legal restrictions to be lifted for individuals in possession of a “vaccination card.”
Bill Gates, someone NPR describes as “a billionaire philanthropist” who has faithfully warned government leaders of pandemics for years, also recently stated that he does not believe “large gatherings will be able to resume until widespread vaccination has taken place.” Gates has provided bottomless funding for global vaccination efforts that not only focus on implementation but exploring utilizing vaccines as a biometric population verification system. One of these operations is the Digital Identity Alliance, known as ID2020, which, under the guise of universal identity protection and enabling fluid accessibility to essential government services, plans to utilize vaccination as the platform for digital identity. The Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation has subsidized numerous research efforts for programs studying ways to implant elements into the human body to verify vaccination records including dyes containing nanocrystals that emit infrared lights, quantum-dot tattoos that apply dissolvable microneedles under the skin, and microchips that can control contraceptive hormones in women’s bodies.
Conducting even a little research will demonstrate that the Gates Foundation has made population control the undisputed cornerstone of its philanthropic efforts, especially in the poorest parts of the world, where, instead of supplying the communities with essential supplies like food and water, they thrust millions of dollars into birth control, abortion, and vaccination services. At a conference in 2010, he proposed a theoretical mathematical equation that could save the world from destruction and confidently stated that “the world today has 6.8 billion people. That’s headed up to about 9 billion. If we do a really great job on new vaccines, health care, reproductive health services, we could lower that by 10-15%.”
The general public praises the production of vaccines in the name of humanity while remaining implausibly oblivious to the inhumane nature of their experimentation or composition. As if the notion that we test them on populations considered to be expendable was novel when recent remarks surfaced by prominent French doctor Jean-Paul Mira, who publicly questioned, “shouldn’t we do this [vaccine] study in Africa…a little bit like we did in certain AIDS studies or with prostitutes?” (He has since apologized), the practice of testing vaccines on “dispensable” subjects traces back more than a half century when researchers utilized human beings in institutional settings such as prisons and mental hospitals without even fully disclosing the nature of the substance being injected.
And despite what vaccine proponents will argue, ingredients such as mercury, formaldehyde, aluminum, polysorbate 80, and squalene are present in many vaccines. These all have admitted adverse health effects but are justified because of their “minimal” content per vaccination. However, even if the content of certain additives in one vaccine is factually “minimal,” the number of total vaccinations recommended for a child is not. In 1983, the CDC recommended 23 doses of 7 different vaccines be given to children from age two months to six years. Today, the recommendation is 50 doses of 14 different vaccines with many being administered in groups. I have not mentioned the fact that three primary vaccinations for children utilize cell lines derived from fetal tissues from elective abortions: MMR, Varicella, and Hepatitis A. The medical research field’s desire for aborted fetal tissue is not hidden as in March, the Washington Post published an article arguing that Trump’s ban on using human fetal tissue from abortions for medical research is hindering the “coronavirus treatment effort.” Do we think that God designed the human body to require aborted fetal tissue to function properly as the American medical community seems to suggest it does through the need for vaccinations?
Based on the reports I previously listed, there is a widespread implication that ordinary citizens will experience future restrictions if they cannot demonstrate that they possess suitable antibodies against COVID-19 with the perilous insinuation that ordinary life cannot resume until a vaccine is implemented. You will not be able to do anything until you allow the government to inject your body with a cocktail of medicinal and non-medicinal ingredients that they have approved and of which they will, most likely, keep you uninformed. While I love this country, it does not take much determined research to confirm that the federal government of the United States is one of the most wasteful, inefficient, deceitful, and corruptible institutions in the world. The expectation that this government has the best interest of its people at heart is woefully naïve and produces dangerous susceptibility to forfeiting personal liberties in the name of physical or economic haven.
For those who refuse vaccine services for their children, it is essential to begin preparing for a situation in which compulsory vaccinations might be implemented. If such despotic legislation is never realized, then the very least one has done is further research an important topic regarding the physical safety of your children. If these measures are achieved, such individuals will need to contemplate serious consequences for their family. One’s job, ability to travel, and the custody of children may be at stake. I would not balk at the impracticality of such a concept since children are removed for much less and the world’s governments now have an opportunity to assert unprecedented levels of control over the liberties of the citizenry, which many people justify in the name of security.
I urge you to seek God’s counsel in these times, because everything is about to change.
