COVID-19 Vaccinations: ‘Soylent Green’ of the 21st Century?

Complimentary Story
   “Take heed that you do not despise one of these little ones, for I say to you that in heaven their angels always see the face of My Father who is in heaven.”  (Matthew 18:10).

   Many of you have heard the rumors that the COVID-19 vaccinations contain human DNA from aborted babies. This is not really true; but sadly, in this case, the truth is even more disturbing than the rumor. 

   Life Site News was permanently banned from You Tube last month after airing an interview with researcher Pamela Acker. Within that interview, Acker, a master’s degree-toting, Catholic Biologist and author of the book, “Vaccination: A Catholic Perspective,” reported that not only do the AstraZeneca and Johnson & Johnson vaccines include fetal cell lines from aborted babies, but these babies were extracted from the womb alive. 

   “They had to maintain a sterile environment because you don’t want any contamination of the tissue with any kind of foreign agents, any bacteria, or viruses, or anything like that. The babies were — and, in some cases, the uterus as well — removed from the woman and, without even puncturing the amniotic sac, placed directly into the refrigerator where it was kept for no more than 24 hours.”

   According to the general practice outlined in the medical literature, the living babies are then, “placed in a fridge while still living where they await dismemberment before having their organs harvested.” 

   Dr. C. Ward Kischer, an embryologist and emeritus professor of anatomy from the University of Arizona College of Medicine, explains, “In order to sustain 95% of the cells, the live tissue would need to be preserved within 5 minutes of the abortion [...] within an hour the cells would continue to deteriorate, rendering the specimen useless.”

   The cell lines harvested for the COVID vaccinations are classified as HEK-293. While the Phizer and Moderna vaccines allegedly do not contain these cell lines, the HEK-293 cell lines were used in the research and development phases of both of those vaccines, and will continue to be used as research continues. 

   Because so much has already been written about HEK-293, I will not duplicate that information here, but you can get a nice overview by reading Dr. Alvin Wong’s paper, “The Ethics of HEK 293” that appeared in the 2006 autumn issue of The National Catholic Bioethics Quarterly. Wong, an oncologist and senior consultant at Singapore’s National University Cancer Institute who has an interest in bioethics, wrote in his paper that due to evidence that the cells were “obtained from the embryo of a willfully induced abortion, [there is] a moral duty on the part of any researcher to discontinue using this cell line.”

   Bishop Athanasius Schneider has called for a “New Pro-Life Movement.” One that not only refuses to have anything to do with abortion, but that refuses to have anything to do with food, products, medicines, or research that harvests and profits off of aborted babies. 

   “The voice of the unborn children’s blood is crying to God from the abortion-tainted vaccines, from the abortion-tainted medicines,” he said. “This voice is crying all over the world, and we have to awaken.  No one who is really deeply concerned about the defense of life and the moral law can be silent or can be quiet and can resign to this situation.”

   Pamela Acker first became aware of the HEK-293 cell lines usage in vaccines and vaccine research a decade ago when working on an HIV vaccine funded by a grant provided by the (drum roll please) Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation!  (You saw that one coming from a mile away, right?) At this point, Acker began to question her involvement in the project, and needless to say, did not have a job after raising concerns. 

   Are these fetal kidney cell lines necessary for the elimination of a virus?  What role do they specifically play in combating COVID? Is the vaccine rendered ineffective without it? What are the physiological implications of injecting human DNA into our bloodstreams? We will likely never be given any straight answers to these questions. 

   But the question that we can know the answer to is whether we, as the Body of Christ, are willing to enter into a Monkey Paw wager where we receive a vaccination that requires another one’s life to be viciously struck down in order to preserve our own. Do we want this kind of blood on our hands? And for what?  Some added protection against a virus that 95% or more of the population recovers from by virtue of their own immune system? 

   This article is a truncated version of two previously-published articles appearing on Real Dark News.com and L. A. Marzulli’s March 2021 issue of the PP&S online magazine. 

VickiJoyAnderson.com
RealDarkNews.com/author/VickiJoy2001/

Learn how to email this article to others