Complimentary Story
March 2025If you’re like me, you were completely underwhelmed, disappointed, angry, and confused over what was supposed to be a complete production and release of the infamous “Epstein files.” The information reportedly contains the identities of the perpetrators and predators behind an unspeakable human and child sex trafficking operation. Past and present leaders of nations, corporations, banks, and those who govern us are reportedly contained in those files. The most criminal of all the criminal globalists.
It was a surprise and disappointment when the Trump administration seemingly received its first “black eye” with the botched release of the much-anticipated Epstein files on February 27, 2025. Upon closer inspection, however, another possibility exists that seems to make much more sense, especially when one considers the knowledge and aptitude of President Trump, Pam Bondi, and Kash Patel, and their promises of transparency to the American people.
Newly confirmed U.S. Attorney General Pam Bondi promised complete transparency and the full release of information hidden from the American public, including the assassination files of President Kennedy, his brother Robert Kennedy, Dr. Martin Luther King, and the full report concerning the sordid criminal network of the (allegedly dead) Jeffrey Epstein. Her first salvo of transparency was slated to be Epstein.
On that same day, President Trump was completing a much-anticipated meeting with British Prime Minister Keir Starmer and his “negotiating team.” The British leader was at the White House to persuade President Trump to continue funding the war in Ukraine and press Russia harder on the world stage. The following day, Ukrainian President Zelinsky met with President Trump and Vice President Vance in the Oval Office. The meeting took a dark turn as Zelinsky exhibited objectionable behavior and disrespect. To the delight of many and the horror of a vocal group of globalists on the Left, the Ukrainian dictator was unceremoniously ejected from the White House, and further events between the two leaders were cancelled.
Meanwhile, at a White House meet-and-greet of pre-selected conservative social influencers on February 27, AG Bondi unexpectedly gave those present a 3-ring binder labeled “Epstein Files-Phase 1.” Public anticipation of finally learning who among the rich and powerful is compromised reached fever pitch that same afternoon. However, the promise of transparency became the target of anger as the public learned that the binders contained an assembly of about 200 pages of information that already existed in the public domain. Many Trump supporters were very unhappy.
The public was told by Attorney General Bondi herself that the FBI provided her with all the investigative materials related to Jeffrey Epstein, and that she was reviewing all the information before releasing it to the public. “The file is on my desk,” she told Fox News. That statement alone should have raised eyebrows, as the investigation and criminal prosecution of Jeffrey Epstein dates to 2010 – in Florida – at a time when none other than Pam Bondi was Florida’s attorney general. Moreover, it’s important to recall that the evidence against Epstein consisted of over 20 years of video and audio recordings, photographs, documents, victim/witness statements, and investigators’ notes. Of all people, she should have known that the FBI possessed far more than the “file on [her] desk.”
Following the blow-up of the botched Epstein disclosure, AG Bondi claims to have been contacted by an FBI whistleblower that night. According to this source, the SDNY office of the FBI was in possession of the elusive trove of evidence against Epstein. Bondi then sent a “strongly worded letter” to her friend and current FBI Director Kash Patel, demanding that all requested material be surrendered to her office no later than 8:00 the next morning. As of this writing, that demand was not met.
Consider that the gatekeepers of the Epstein evidence, or whatever remains, are the same deep state actors within the Intelligence Community who were involved in the attempted political assassination of President Trump before and during his first term. The Steele Dossier, a completely fictitious report that accused Trump of sordid activity while in Russia and maintaining a “treasonous” relationship with Russian President Putin, had deep roots in the UK. Specifically, dossier author Christopher Steele worked for MI6, the UK’s version of the CIA, as its Russian Desk director. He likely continues as an agent of MI6. The role of Britain in matters related to RussiaGate, Crossfire Hurricane, the Mar-a-Lago raid, and impeachments was a joint venture between the U.S. and Britain and involves many of the same people who continue their political coup against President Trump.
Now consider the Epstein evidence. Its complete disclosure has the potential to take down leaders in the U.S. and elsewhere, especially members of the British royal family, such as Prince Andrew, who was stripped of his royal duties and military titles. British Prime Minister Keir Starmer finds himself in a “sticky wicket” as the British say, between the deeds of MI6 and the Royals.
The wicket became stickier as his visit progressed. Is it possible that the seemingly unplanned and unexpected release of the Epstein Files Phase 1, amid much misplaced fanfare, causing frustration and anger among the American public, was indeed planned, but not as the actual revelation of incendiary information? AG Bondi had to realize that what she released was not what we were expecting. Was the act of furnishing binders filled commonly known information, along with a photo op of the recipients holding them for cameras outside the Oval Office, exquisitely timed with Starmer’s visit, just that – an act? One not for the benefit of disclosure, but for leverage against Britain? And a warning to MI6 and the globalists who are continuing their war against president Trump? And to US intelligence assets?
Considering that possession of leadership-ending evidence constitutes a nearly insurmountable weapon, was this a multi-faceted tactic used by President Trump to fight against any further British-U.S. coup attempts, placing both the intelligence agencies of Britain and the U.S. that he, in fact, has the goods against the most rich and powerful globalists domestically and internationally?
The “blunder” was sophomoric, and the blowback had to be anticipated. Perhaps most telling of all, it was all perfectly timed around the planned visits of Starmer and Zelinsky. If my analysis is correct, the US and President Trump have more leverage on the world stage and against the rogue IC than ever before. Time will tell.
HagmannPI.com
